The Evaluation of a New Triphala-Reinforced Adhesive System for Retention of Maxillofacial Prosthesis in a Clinical Setting

Triphala-Reinforced Adhesive System for Retention of Maxillofacial Prosthesis

Abstract

Background: Maxillofacial prosthetics require effective adhesives for retention, functionality, and comfort. Traditional adhesives often result in complications such as skin irritation and allergic reactions. Triphala, an herbal formulation known for its anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties, has been proposed as a potential alternative adhesive for maxillofacial prosthetics.Hence the study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical performance, patient satisfaction, and incidence of adverse reactions associated with a Triphala-reinforced adhesive system compared to conventional synthetic adhesives for maxillofacial prosthetics.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 40 participants in need of facial prosthetics at a specialized clinic. Participants were randomly assigned to use either the Triphala-reinforced adhesive or a standard synthetic adhesive. The primary outcomes assessed were adhesive performance, patient satisfaction, and adverse reactions over a 12-month period. Statistical analysis was conducted using independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Chi-square tests.

Results: The Triphala-reinforced adhesive group demonstrated significantly superior adhesive performance (p < 0.001) and higher patient satisfaction (p = 0.002) compared to the synthetic adhesive group. Furthermore, the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the Triphala group (p = 0.015).

Conclusions: The Triphala-reinforced adhesive system provides a promising alternative to traditional synthetic adhesives in maxillofacial prosthetics. It offers improved performance, higher patient satisfaction, and a reduced incidence of adverse reactions, making it a valuable option for clinical use.